Here is some logic that I find interesting.
S.D. to require all adults to be armed.
Rep. Hal Wick, R-Sioux Falls, is sponsoring the bill and knows it will be killed. But he said he is introducing it to prove a point that the federal health care reform mandate passed last year is unconstitutional.
“Do I or the other cosponsors believe that the State of South Dakota can require citizens to buy firearms? Of course not. But at the same time, we do not believe the federal government can order every citizen to buy health insurance,” he said.
Maybe it will get killed before it ever leaves the floor. On one side, how do you enforce it? The other, Who decides what is “suitable to their temperament, physical capacity, and preference.” Well, obviously, the person choosing but how many would get a single shot .22 just to comply? LOL Then again, we are talking S.D. Probably more varmint rifles in that state than most others. That whole prairie dog thing yaknow.
(who wouldn't want to blast those little heathens. LOL)
3 comments:
It is a valid argument! And one that will get their attention in the District of Criminals. I love it.
Extremely valid. Funny how you have to drive around the rock to get it to fall on the heads of those in the lead though ain't it?
Dang, I hope that not only passes, but the only ones who vote against it are from California! Wow, that'd be great.
But, I gotta LOL out loud big time (I think that's ROFLMBO) with the picture and your comment... heathens- lol: "Let everything that has breath praise the Lord!" (Psalm 150)
Shy III
Post a Comment