Color me paranoid

I have been taking in some of the 'information' on the MSM's (don't shoot at me yet, let me say my piece first) on the shooting in Arizona.

Color me paranoid but something stinks.

The timing for one.

Recent events being, the swearing in of new batch of suspected conservatives in the house. The Demoniods still control the senate and there is a treaty with the UN #1 (still under construction but,,,,)that would effectively circumvent the Second Amendment. As has been stated by this administration in the past, "Never let a crisis go to waste, it opens the doors to do 'great things' "

Maybe I am wrong but the spin I am seeing from the libtard media is spewing more and more feel good BS out there instead of honest to God facts of what the hell went down. Instead of reporting on the facts they have and awaiting a real investigation, they are doing what they always do and dig up every little heart wrenching string they can find.

My real concern here is based upon historical reference. The Firearms Act of 1934 was sold as a way to control a no longer dangerous crime element. Then in 1968, they amended it with another bill that only further restricted civilians. (facts are facts, Criminals don't give a rats ass about the laws. THAT is why they are criminals. Therefore, laws don't effect the criminals but MAKE criminals out of civilians.) Again in 1986 it was further amended and while it only affected machine guns, it further reduced the scope of what was not "approved" for the general public. Each time, there were high profile killings involved. Killings that may or may not have been 'coordinated' but that fact will probably never fully be uncovered in this or any other lifetime. The only true high profile killing that didn't result directly in some other infringement upon our rights was that of JFK . That one is still so controversial, that one has to wonder just what really happened. The fact that there wasn't a move on the FedGov's part to infringe upon us, well, again, color me paranoid. I think that due to the fact that they didn't go out of their way to 'tighten the reins', shows that it was an inside job and ALMOST didn't get covered up.(that whole Jack Ruby thing rolled it up nicely.)

Maybe it doesn't help that I am reading 'Unintended Consequences" again during my down time at work.

Again, color me paranoid.

Either way, I think its time to splurge and go buy another couple thousand rounds BEFORE they start some BS legislation.

Just in case ya know.


#1: Don't ever forget that Snopes is mostly driven by a leftist organization. They are biased and it shows in some of their reports. I only link to them to show one side of the coin.