Stratagems or extortion?

Been pondering this whole Osammy bin Rotten (Love that name, thanks Mayberry!) thing for a couple of days.

I don't really give two squirts about his death to be quite honest. The whole mess should have been cleared up years ago. The fact that it wasn't shows the 'quality' of tool that he represented to the PTB.

And tool he was. The convenience of his 'recent' demise really show a level of desperation by the PTB. One only has to watch the media clamoring for 'juice' to 'expose' to realize that this is a con job from the get-go. IMO any time the media harps this loudly about something, there is smoke somewhere. They are trying to force the opinions against a tide. From conversations I have had amongst persons I work with; 10 for 10 so far have had doubts about the whole she-bang.

With reason I might add. Those reasons vary from person to person but all have one common thread. Convenience. Things are just too glossed over. After 10 years, this rat bastard should be a hard target. His corpse should be shown at the beginning of the Super-bowl or something. Hell, the Dillinger gang was easier to nab and the evidence of their demise was plastered all over the front pages from here to L.A.

Nope, they nail him in a simple raid, double tap him in the face (bye-bye distinguishing features) then pop him in copter to run to a ship off the coast, then drop him in the wide open blue wonder to become crab bait.

Yeah, Like others have said; " If you buy that, I will throw the Golden Gate in free".

But lets take a look at the key points of this stratagem. One dead guy that is now a martyr for a cause, no matter if he is now dead or has been dead for years (on ice). He is now PUBLICLY dead.

Cue Bono?

Obama? What would he benefit from this 'stunt'? A few brownie points towards a souring re-election? Seems to me, that if this were the scenario, he would have held his cards a bit closer the chest and dealt them out later in the game. SO....
That leads to a point brought up by Ann B. The WhiteHouse insider supposedly had an article about who was really behind this. Take it with a grain of salt as the source is questionable at best, but the vindication behind those supposedly usurping O'boys position then handing him the reins to 'take credit' makes quite a bit more sense than O'boy pulling a fast one to gain a few points in the polls.

But really, WHO benefits? Obviously not the PEOPLE of the U.S. I don't see any legislation to repeal ANY of the draconian measures that were enacted after 9/11. Not one blip on the screen of that action. Quite the opposite. More 'threats' coming down the pike (and possibly more real than the ones we have been getting now that the scab has been yanked off that pustulant sore.) Tighter 'security' (to be read "more aggressive molestation"). And yet, we still have open borders; unless you are trying to get out, of course.

SO,, once again, Cue Bono?

There is only one answer to that. It ain't good either. The facts are in, all you have to do is watch the opposing theaters for action to see where all of this is heading. One of those theaters is the markets. Commodities, stocks and bonds, the dollar index. Hell, even oil took a dip today. People are pulling out at a rate that has potential to really pound another stake in the heart of this Zombie we call a country. But that's not the only arena to watch. Watch the III'pers too. Watch how little is actually being said. (as noted on Bills page, the leaders that propose themselves, are little better than the ones we already have. )

Yeah, we are talking but most of us are pretty much done with talking now. Its time to pull together in the smallest target possible. Our families and ourselves.
Is the ball rolling now? Who really knows. But I wouldn't hedge my bets against it.